Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladyslav Vlasiuk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 14:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vladyslav Vlasiuk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not every third-level staffer working under Zelenskyy is encyclopedically notable. Biruitorul Talk 12:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS (to avoid being called a hypocrite) I made a start with the article on Serhiy Lysak; although this is not the best use of my time today... real life issues and whatnot... Obviously some help for the Wikipedia page for Serhiy Lysak is really welcome... — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 13:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
PS2 Governor of Odesa Oblast Borys Voloshenkov and Governor of Zaporizhzhia Oblast Yuriy Malashko (also) do not have there own English language Wikipedia page... These people are encyclopedically notable while the encyclopedically notablility of Vladyslav Vlasiuk is a lot more questionable... Actually I find that someone took the time to create a Wikipedia article about Vladyslav Vlasiuk while ignoring the fact that 3 Ukrainian governors had no English language Wikipedia pages absurdity in motion... — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 14:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment At least two sources [1][2] come from notable Ukrainian newspapers. Much of the article mentions sanctions against Russia and other war-related stuff, so the article needs some cleaning up. It could be kept as a stub or transferred to the Ukrainian version.--Bexaendos (talk) 21:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • The Kyiv Post article, at least, doesn’t establish notability. It’s a human-interest story about an up-and-coming young lawyer, of the type that every newspaper runs all the time, without that translating into notability. — Biruitorul Talk 04:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, this person is not noteworthy enough. As Biruitorul points out here above an adviser to an adviser of a President is not noteworthy and the rest of Vlasiuk life and career is also not making him interesting enough for his own Wikipedia article (although a translation and move to Ukrainian Wikipedia might be, as Bexaendos sugested earlier here, a good idea). — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 19:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.